In a new book, Global Weirdness, scientists and journalists ask fundamental questions about climate change. Here they answer the question of whether droughts, heat waves, and other extreme weather are due to global warming.
Based on their understanding of how the climate system works, scientists expect that a warming Earth should see more and more episodes of weather extremes such as droughts, floods, heat waves and severe storms. The reason for more heat waves is pretty obvious. If you define a heat wave as an extended stretch of days when the temperature is well above what we now think of as normal in a month when temperatures are already high (July and August in the U.S., for example), then a generally warmer world will have more stretches like this.
With droughts and floods, the reason may be less obvious. But in a warmer world, more water evaporates from the oceans and other bodies of water, and also from the soil. So the land will tend to be drierâ"but when it does rain or snow, thereâs more water vapor stored up in the atmosphere, so precipitation should be heavier. That could lead in turn to a higher risk of flooding. Atmospheric scientists calculate that the warming over the 20th century should have put about 5% more water vapor into the atmosphere today, on average, that there was in 1900.
Even so, itâs difficult to prove definitively that extreme weather events have increased, unless weâre talking about averages over the entire globe, or at least over very large regions. Thatâs because the most extreme eventsâ"the worst storms, droughts and floodsâ"tend to come less often than ordinary events. Climate and weather scientists talk about â100-year floods,â for example, meaning a flood so big it should happen s about once in every 100 years (or 10 times in a thousand years), on average, in a particular location.
But thatâs only an average, so if you have two such floods in a 100-year period, does that mean the risk has doubled, or maybe that you are now âokâsafe for the next 200 years? Or is it just a statistical fluke, similar to flipping a coin and getting two heads in a row just by chance? It can be hard to tell. Itâs even harder when you donât have good measurements over the past century in all parts of the world, and when different parts of the world respond to climate change in their own ways.
Even today, with much better monitoring, itâs a challenge for scientists to gather enough information to draw firm conclusions about long-term trends over large regions. Itâs more difficult still to say anything concrete about the role of climate change in single events. No single event, such as the deadly heat wave that hit Europe in 2003 or the 2010 floods in Pakistan or heat and wildfires in Russia can be definitely blamed on climate change: we think that climate change has made events like these more likely, but they could have happened anyway.
Corn plants struggle to survive in a drought-stricken Indiana. (Scott Olson / Getty Images)
For single events like these, the best scientists can do is calculate whether climate change has tipped the odds in favor of such events happeningâ"whether the coin youâre flipping has become slightly loaded in favor of tails, for example. A study published in 2005 showed just that kind of loading for the European heat wave of 2003.
As for general trends, hereâs what the Intergovernmnental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said about extreme weather: âGlobally, the area affected by drought has likely increased since the 1970sâ¦It is likely that heat waves have become more frequent over most land areas....It is likely that the frequency of heavy precipitation eventsâ¦. has increased over most areas. It is likely that the incidence of extreme high sea level has increased at a broad range of sites worldwide since 1975.â
No single event, such as the deadly heat wave that hit Europe in 2003 or the 2010 floods in Pakistan or heat and wildfires in Russia can be definitely blamed on climate change.
âGlobal Weirdness: Severe Storms, Deadly Heat Waves, Relentless Drought, Rising Seas and the Weather of the Futureâ By Climate Central. 224 pages. Pantheon. $22.95.
The word âlikelyâ in the IPCC report means that thereâs at least a two-thirds probability that something is trueâ"meaning that while its higher than 50-50, thereâs still a sizable uncertainty, for the reasons explained up above. What scientists can say is that events like this should happen more often in a warmer world. If our planet continues to warm as scientists expectâ"and as our record of observations gets longer and more comprehensiveâ"scientists will be able to make more definitive statements.
But theyâre also trying to do better with the information they have today. Using special statistical techniques designed to look at extreme events, scientists have done studies, published after the last major IPCC report on global climate, in, to look at changes in extreme temperature and precipitation events over large areas of the world. Theyâve detected evidence of a human role in these changes. However, itâs still very hard to say anything definitive about the human fingerprint on specific, local types of extreme weather.
Excerpted from Global Weirdness by Climate Central. Copyright © 2012 by Climate Central, Inc.. Excerpted by permission of Pantheon, a division of Random House, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.
This book was produced collectively by scientists and journalists at Climate Central, a nonprofit, nonpartisan science and journalism organization. It was written by Emily Elert and Michael D. Lemonick. Prior to external scientific peer review, it was reviewed by staff scientists Philip Duffy, Ph.D. (chief scientist), Nicole Heller, Ph.D. (ecosystems and adaptation), Alyson Kenward, Ph.D. (chemistry), Eric Larson, Ph.D. (energy systems) and Claudia Tebaldi, Ph.D. (climate statistics).
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment